Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.7

3.7 Total Fertility Rate

Total fertility rate is the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime. Replacement-level fertility, about 2.1 in developed countries, keeps a population stable over time, and fertility falls as girls get more education, family planning becomes available and fewer infants die.

Key terms

  • total fertility rate (TFR)
  • replacement-level fertility
  • infant mortality rate
  • family planning

Total fertility rate

Total fertility rate (TFR) is the average number of children each woman in a population would have during her childbearing years, based on current birth rates at each age. It's one of the best single predictors of future population growth.

Global TFR has fallen from about 5 in the 1960s to roughly 2.2–2.3 today. It varies enormously by country: some countries in sub-Saharan Africa, such as Niger, have TFRs around 6, while South Korea's has dropped below 1, among the lowest ever recorded. The U.S. TFR is about 1.6.

Replacement-level fertility

Replacement-level fertility is the TFR needed for each generation to exactly replace itself, so the population stays stable over the long run (ignoring migration). You might expect it to be exactly 2, one child for each parent. It's slightly higher, about 2.1 in developed countries, because some children die before reaching adulthood and slightly more boys than girls are born.

In countries where many children die young, replacement level is higher, sometimes 2.5 or more. If TFR stays below replacement for a long time, the population will eventually shrink unless immigration makes up the difference.

Infant mortality

Infant mortality rate is the number of babies who die before their first birthday per 1,000 live births. It's a strong indicator of a country's health care, nutrition and sanitation. Babies are more likely to survive when their mothers get good health care, including care during pregnancy, and enough nutritious food.

Infant mortality and TFR are closely linked. Where many infants die, parents tend to have more children to make sure some survive. As infant mortality falls, families usually have fewer children, but there's often a lag of a generation or more, which causes a period of rapid population growth.

What lowers fertility

Cultural and religious values also affect fertility. In some countries, TFR remains high even as incomes rise, while in others it has fallen far below replacement.

  • Education for girls and women: women with more schooling tend to marry later, have more job options and choose smaller families.
  • Later age at first marriage and first birth: fewer childbearing years leads to fewer children.
  • Access to family planning: affordable contraception lets couples choose how many children to have and when.
  • Lower infant mortality: when children reliably survive, parents don't need as many.
  • Economic changes: in cities and industrial economies, children are expensive and don't work on family farms, and pensions reduce the need for children to support parents in old age.
  • Government policy: China's one-child policy (1980–2015) lowered births through strict limits, while other governments use incentives to encourage or discourage childbearing.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1Calculator allowed

    Calculating infant mortality

    In one year, a country records 160,000 live births and 2,400 deaths of infants under 1 year old. Calculate the infant mortality rate.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Infant mortality rate = infant deaths ÷ live births × 1,000.
    2. Step 2: 2,400 ÷ 160,000 = 0.015.
    3. Step 3: 0.015 × 1,000 = 15.

    Answer: 15 infant deaths per 1,000 live births.

  2. Example 2

    Explaining a falling TFR

    Over 30 years, a country's TFR fell from 5.8 to 2.4. During that time, the share of girls finishing secondary school rose from 20% to 70%, and infant mortality fell from 90 to 25 per 1,000. Explain how these changes could have lowered TFR, and predict whether the population is still growing.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Education: more girls finishing school leads to later marriage, more job options and better knowledge of family planning, so women tend to have fewer children.
    2. Step 2: Infant mortality: with far fewer infants dying, parents don't need to have extra children to ensure some survive.
    3. Step 3: Is it still growing? A TFR of 2.4 is above replacement (about 2.1), and the country likely has a large young population from the high-fertility years, so yes, it's still growing because of population momentum.

    Answer: Education and lower infant mortality reduced the number of children families chose to have. With TFR still above replacement and a large young population, the country is still growing.

Common mistakes

  • Saying replacement-level fertility is exactly 2.0. It's about 2.1 in developed countries and higher where child mortality is high.
  • Confusing TFR with crude birth rate. TFR is children per woman; crude birth rate is births per 1,000 people per year.
  • Expecting population to stop growing the moment TFR reaches replacement. Population momentum continues growth for decades.

On the exam

  • Free-response questions often ask for factors that lower fertility. Name a specific factor, like access to education for women, and explain how it lowers TFR.
  • Be ready to compare a country's TFR with replacement level and predict growth.

Connected topics

Videos

Check yourself

5 questions on 3.7 Total Fertility Rate. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 5

Which change in a developing country would most likely lead to the largest long-term decrease in its total fertility rate?

Question 2 of 5

Replacement-level fertility is about 2.1 in developed countries but higher in many developing countries. Which statement best explains this difference?

Question 3 of 5

In many countries, a drop in infant mortality has been followed, a decade or two later, by a drop in the total fertility rate. Which statement best explains this pattern?

CountryTotal fertility rateWomen completing secondary school (%)Couples using modern contraception (%)
V6.1812
W4.32530
X2.66058
Y1.69275

Hypothetical data

Question 4 of 5

Which statement is best supported by the data?

Question 5 of 5

Assuming no migration, which country's population is most likely to shrink in the long run?

0 of 5 answered