AP® Comparative Government and Politics review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/comp-gov/units/2/2-5)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.5
2.5 Removal of Executives
Systems differ in how an executive can be removed. Parliamentary systems use votes of no confidence and party leadership changes; presidential systems use impeachment; Iran's Supreme Leader can in theory be dismissed by the Assembly of Experts; and in China removal happens inside the Communist Party.
Key terms
- impeachment
- vote of no confidence
- Assembly of Experts
- removal from office
- succession
- party leadership election
Recent change to know (as of October 2026)
In July 2026 the UK changed prime minister without a general election. The prime minister resigned as Labour Party leader, the party chose a new leader, and the new leader was appointed prime minister by the monarch because they could command a Commons majority. The next general election is due by 2029. This is the most common way UK prime ministers leave office between elections: through their own party, not a confidence vote.
Removal in parliamentary systems
A vote of no confidence is a vote in the legislature on whether it still supports the government. If the government loses, it must resign or call an election. The last UK government to lose one was in 1979, which led to a general election.
More often, UK prime ministers are pushed out by their own party. Margaret Thatcher was replaced after a party leadership challenge in 1990, and the prime ministers who left office in 2019, 2022 and 2026 resigned after losing the support of their party's MPs. In each case the party chose a new leader, who became prime minister.
Removal in presidential and other systems
- Mexico: Impeachment in Congress applies to many officials, but a sitting president can be charged only for a short list of serious crimes, such as treason. A 2021 amendment widened the list to include corruption, electoral crimes and any crime an ordinary citizen could be tried for. The Chamber of Deputies brings the charge and the Senate decides. A recall vote was added in 2019; the first was held in 2022, but turnout of about 18% fell short of the 40% needed to make it binding. A 2026 amendment set June 2028 as the date for the next possible recall vote.
- Nigeria: At least one-third of the members of the National Assembly must sign a notice of misconduct, two-thirds of each house must vote to investigate, a panel chosen by the Chief Justice investigates, and two-thirds of each house must vote to remove.
- Russia: The Duma brings charges by a two-thirds vote, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court must confirm, and the Federation Council removes the president by a two-thirds vote. The Duma can also vote no confidence in the government (the prime minister and cabinet), but the president decides whether to dismiss it or dissolve the Duma.
- Iran: The Assembly of Experts can dismiss the Supreme Leader if it finds the leader unable to carry out the duties. The Majles can declare the president incompetent by a two-thirds vote, and the Supreme Leader then dismisses the president. This happened in 1981 to Iran's first president, Abolhassan Banisadr.
- China: The constitution lets the National People's Congress remove the state president, but in practice leadership changes are decided inside the party leadership, out of public view.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Comparing removal processes
Compare how the UK and Nigeria can remove their chief executive.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: UK: the House of Commons can pass a vote of no confidence, or the governing party can replace its leader, who then stops being prime minister. Removal is relatively easy and political.
- Step 2: Nigeria: the president can be removed only by impeachment for gross misconduct, with two-thirds votes in both houses and an investigation. Removal is hard and quasi-legal.
- Step 3: Compare and explain: the difference reflects fusion of powers in the UK (the executive depends on the legislature) versus separation of powers in Nigeria (the president has a fixed term and an independent mandate).
Answer: The UK prime minister can be removed by a simple confidence vote or by the party choosing a new leader, while Nigeria's president can be removed only through a demanding impeachment process, reflecting fusion versus separation of powers.
Common mistakes
- Thinking the UK needs a general election to change prime minister. A party can change its leader, and the new leader becomes prime minister.
- Saying Iran's voters can remove the Supreme Leader. Only the Assembly of Experts can.
- Describing impeachment as removal. Impeachment brings charges; removal requires a separate vote or ruling.
On the exam
- Questions often ask why removal is easier in one system than another. Tie your explanation to fusion or separation of powers.
- Recent, dated examples (like the UK's July 2026 change) make strong evidence, but keep the focus on the rule, not the person.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 2.5 Removal of Executives. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Which feature makes it especially difficult to remove Russia's president from office?
In 1981, Iran's first president was removed from office. Which combination of institutions does Iran's constitution give the power to remove a president?
Mexico held its first presidential recall referendum in 2022. Turnout was about 18 percent, below the 40 percent needed for the result to be binding. This outcome best shows that
Nigeria's president can be removed before the end of the term through
0 of 4 answered