Skip to main content

Unit 1 · Topic 1.10

1.10 Political Stability

A politically stable state can keep order, enforce laws and collect taxes across its whole territory. Stability is tested by separatism, insurgency, organized crime, corruption and economic shocks. Indices like the Fragile States Index try to measure how well states hold up.

Key terms

  • political stability
  • state capacity
  • failed state
  • insurgency
  • Fragile States Index

Recent change to know (as of October 2026)

In early 2026 Iran was at war with Israel and the United States, and an airstrike killed its Supreme Leader on 28 February (see 1.6). Older study materials won't reflect this, so check current sources before using Iran's stability as evidence.

Stability and state capacity

State capacity is a government's ability to do what states are supposed to do: control territory, enforce laws, provide services and collect revenue. Political stability means the regime and government can carry on without violent disruption.

Stability is not the same as democracy. An authoritarian regime can be stable for decades, and a democracy can be unstable. A failed state is one that has lost control over much of its territory and can no longer provide basic services or security.

Threats in the course countries

CountryMain threats to stability
MexicoDrug cartel violence; corruption among police and officials
NigeriaBoko Haram and ISWAP in the northeast; banditry in the northwest; farmer-herder clashes; separatist pressure in the southeast
RussiaPast wars in Chechnya; a 2023 armed mutiny by the Wagner mercenary group; sanctions and war costs
IranRecurring protest waves; economic pressure from sanctions; the 2026 war
ChinaUnrest in Xinjiang and Tibet; protests in Hong Kong in 2019; slowing growth
UKPressure for Scottish independence; legacy of conflict in Northern Ireland

How governments respond

Responses range from building institutions to using force. Mexico deployed the army against cartels from 2006 and created a National Guard in 2019; a 2024 constitutional change placed the National Guard under the Defense Ministry. Supporters say this brings discipline and resources, while critics worry about militarizing policing.

The UK ended decades of violence in Northern Ireland with the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, which created a power-sharing government. Nigeria has combined military campaigns in the northeast with an amnesty program for Niger Delta militants from 2009. China has relied on heavy security and surveillance in Xinjiang. Russia fought two wars in Chechnya and now relies on a loyal regional leader there.

Reform pressure, corruption and investment

Governments of every regime type try to limit violent and divisive groups partly to reassure investors. Foreign companies avoid places where contracts and staff aren't safe, so instability costs growth.

Pressure from citizens can also produce new institutions. Nigeria's 2020 #EndSARS protests against police abuse led the government to disband the SARS police unit. In Mexico, years of civic pressure helped create an independent electoral institute in the 1990s.

Countries fight corruption in different ways. China relies on the party's own discipline commission, which answers to party leaders. The UK relies on independent courts, a free press and parliamentary watchdogs.

Measuring stability

The Fragile States Index, published by the Fund for Peace, scores states on pressures like security threats, group grievances, economic decline and the legitimacy of the state. A higher score means more fragile. Nigeria usually scores as one of the more fragile of the six course countries, and the UK as the least. Before quoting a specific score, check the year and the source.

Remember that stability can hide weakness. A regime can look stable because it suppresses dissent, and then face sudden unrest when a shock hits, as Russia did during the brief 2023 mutiny.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming authoritarian regimes are always unstable or democracies always stable. Stability and regime type are separate questions.
  • Reading a higher Fragile States Index score as better. Higher means more fragile.
  • Listing threats without explaining how they weaken state capacity, such as violence that keeps the state from collecting taxes or providing services.

On the exam

  • Questions often ask for one challenge to stability in a named country and one government response. Pair them, such as Boko Haram and Nigeria's military campaign.
  • In data questions, connect a fragility score to specific pressures you know about the country.

Connected topics

Videos

  • 1.10: Political Stability! AP Comparative Government & Politics

    The EasonWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • 1.10: Political Stability, AP Comp Gov Unit 1

    Caitlin KimakWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Comparative Government Quick Review #6: States - Strong, Weak, and Failed

    Josh ClarkWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Political Legitimacy & Stability

    Ms. MarWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • 1.10: Protest Groups, Drug Trafficking, & Political Stability! AP Comparative Government & Politics

    The EasonWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Comparative Quick Review #7: State - Capacity and Autonomy

    Josh ClarkWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 1.10 Political Stability. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

The Boko Haram insurgency in northeastern Nigeria, which began in 2009, is most directly a challenge to

Question 2 of 4

Drug cartel violence in parts of Mexico is best described as a threat to political stability because it

Question 3 of 4

A state that can no longer provide basic security or public services across much of its territory is best described as

Question 4 of 4

A state's sovereignty is most directly challenged when

0 of 4 answered