Qualitative/quantitative translation (QQT)
Two conducting spheres joined by a wire
- Units 9 and 10
- 8 points
- About 18 minutes
You can use a calculator on this question, just like on exam day.
A shorter multipart problem that connects reasoning in words with an equation. You make and justify a claim without equations, derive an equation from a physics principle, and then explain whether the two agree or use them to predict what happens in a changed situation. On the exam: Question 4 of 4. Section II has 4 questions in 95 minutes (50% of the exam score), one of each type in this order; calculator and equation sheet allowed. The CED suggests 15–20 minutes.
The question
Two conducting spheres are far apart and connected by a long, thin conducting wire. Sphere 1 has radius R, and sphere 2 has radius 3R. A total charge +Q is placed on the system, which then reaches electrostatic equilibrium. Ignore any charge on the wire, and treat each sphere as if the other were very far away.
Suggested time: 18 minutes
Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.
Part (a)
3 points(i) Does sphere 1 have more charge than, less charge than, or the same charge as sphere 2? (ii) Is the magnitude of the electric field just outside the surface of sphere 1 greater than, less than, or equal to that just outside sphere 2? Justify your answers. Do not use equations in this part; reason in words.
Type math plainly, like x^2, sqrt(x) or (x+1)/(x−1).
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (b)
3 pointsDerive expressions for the charge on each sphere, and , in terms of Q, and for the ratio of the field magnitudes just outside the surfaces of the spheres.
Type math plainly, like x^2, sqrt(x) or (x+1)/(x−1).
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (c)
2 pointsExplain how your expressions from part (b) agree with your reasoning in part (a).
Type math plainly, like x^2, sqrt(x) or (x+1)/(x−1).
0 / 2,500 characters
Checking scoring…
Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.