Skip to main content

Unit 6 · Topic 6.2

6.2 The Spread of Industry Throughout Europe

After 1815, industry spread from Britain to the European continent, but unevenly. Belgium, northern France and the German states caught up fastest, often with governments actively helping, while southern and eastern Europe stayed mostly agricultural until late in the century.

Key terms

  • railroads
  • Zollverein
  • Friedrich List
  • protective tariffs
  • uneven industrialization

Britain's lead on display

In 1851 Britain showed off its industrial lead at the Great Exhibition in London, held in the Crystal Palace, a giant hall of iron and glass. Visitors from around the world saw British steam engines, power looms and locomotives. Britain's lead rested mainly on private initiative: engineers, inventors, investors and banks, working under a Parliament that represented commercial interests. Parliament even granted cash awards to some inventors, such as £10,000 to Edmund Cartwright in 1809. The repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846 (6.9) showed how much influence industrial and commercial interests had gained.

Following Britain, with more state help

Continental countries had a disadvantage and an advantage. The disadvantage: the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (1792–1815) had disrupted trade and investment for a generation. The advantage: they could copy British machines and hire British engineers instead of inventing everything themselves.

Because private capital was scarcer, continental governments did more. They built or planned railroads, set tariffs, funded technical schools and sometimes gave banks and companies special privileges. This is a key contrast: British industrialization was mostly private and unplanned, while continental industrialization often had state sponsorship.

Railroads tie it together

Railroads were the great engine of the spread. George Stephenson's locomotive the Rocket won the Rainhill Trials in 1829, and the Liverpool and Manchester Railway opened in 1830 as the first intercity line with regular steam-powered passenger trains. By 1850 Britain had more than 6,000 miles of track.

Railroads did three things at once. They cut the cost and time of moving goods, creating national markets. They created huge demand for coal, iron and later steel. And they needed so much money that they pushed the growth of banks and joint-stock companies. On the continent, governments usually planned the networks: Belgium's state-built line from Brussels to Mechelen (1835) is usually counted as the first steam passenger railway on the European continent, and a French law of 1842 had the state prepare the routes while private companies ran the trains.

Country by country

RegionPaceWhy
BelgiumFastest on the continentCoal and iron, British engineers such as John Cockerill, a state-built railway network
FranceSteady but slower, with less disruptionLess coal, many small family farms after the Revolution, slower population growth, many small firms and skilled crafts that survived alongside factories
German statesSlow start, then rapid after 1850Political division at first; then the Zollverein, Ruhr coal, railroads and big banks
RussiaVery lateSerfdom until 1861, little capital; a state-led push in the 1890s under finance minister Sergei Witte, including the Trans-Siberian Railway (begun 1891)
Southern EuropeLate and patchyPoor transport, little coal, powerful landowning elites, little government support; in Italy and Spain industry clustered in a few northern regions

The Zollverein and Friedrich List

Before 1834 the German Confederation was a patchwork of states, each charging tolls on goods crossing its borders. The Zollverein, a customs union led by Prussia that took effect in 1834, removed those internal tariffs and set a common tariff toward outsiders. Austria was left out. That decision mattered later: it tied the smaller German states economically to Prussia, a step toward Prussian-led unification in 1871 (7.3).

The economist Friedrich List argued in The National System of Political Economy (1841) that young industries in a country like Germany could not survive head-to-head competition with Britain. He called for protective tariffs to shelter these infant industries and for a national railroad network. His ideas challenged the free-trade liberalism of Adam Smith and influenced German policy later in the century.

Uneven results

By 1850 a band of industry ran from Britain across northern France and Belgium into the Rhineland and Saxony, while much of Europe still lived on the land. Where farming methods stayed old-fashioned and a few landlords owned most of the land, peasants were often in debt, short of land and at risk of hunger. The bad harvests of the “Hungry Forties” hit much of Europe, and Ireland is a grim example: when potato blight struck in 1845, about a million people died in the Great Famine and over a million emigrated. In eastern Europe, serfdom tied peasants to estates and kept internal markets small, which is a major reason Russia lagged until emancipation (6.6).

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Comparing British and continental industrialization

    Describe ONE difference between the way Britain industrialized and the way the German states industrialized in the 1800s.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify the difference in one clear sentence: the role of the state.
    2. Step 2: Give evidence for each side. Britain: private entrepreneurs and inventors, little government planning. German states: the Prussian-led Zollverein (1834) and state support for railroads.
    3. Step 3: Add the reason for the difference: German states started later, had less private capital and faced British competition, so governments stepped in.

    Answer: Britain's industrialization was driven mostly by private entrepreneurs with little government planning, while the German states relied much more on state action. Prussia led the Zollverein customs union in 1834 and governments backed railroad building, because starting later and with less private capital, German producers needed help to compete with established British industry.

Common mistakes

  • Including Austria in the Zollverein. Prussia deliberately kept Austria out, which strengthened Prussia's lead among German states.
  • Treating Europe as industrializing all at once. Stress unevenness: Belgium early, Germany fast after 1850, Russia and the south late.
  • Mixing up List's protectionism with Smith's free trade. List argued that tariffs protect young industries; Smith wanted few barriers to trade.

On the exam

  • Comparison questions often pair Britain with a continental state. The role of government is the strongest point of contrast.
  • Railroads are excellent evidence for both the spread of industry and later topics such as nationalism and imperialism.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Europe's INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION [AP Euro Review, Unit 6 Topic 2]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 6.2: Spread of Industry Throughout Europe

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The SPREAD of INDUSTRIALIZATION from 1750-1900 [AP World History Review—Unit 5 Topic 4]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Industrial Revolution: Crash Course European History #24

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Railroad Journey and the Industrial Revolution: Crash Course World History 214

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

3 questions on 6.2 The Spread of Industry Throughout Europe. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 3

Compared with Britain, industrialization in the German states differed mainly in that

It is a very common clever device that when anyone has attained the summit of greatness, he kicks away the ladder by which he has climbed up, in order to deprive others of the means of climbing up after him. In this lies the secret of the cosmopolitical doctrine of Adam Smith . . . .

Any nation which by means of protective duties and restrictions on navigation has raised her manufacturing power and her navigation to such a degree of development that no other nation can sustain free competition with her, can do nothing wiser than to throw away these ladders of her greatness, to preach to other nations the benefits of free trade . . . .

Source: Friedrich List, German economist, The National System of Political Economy, 1841. Translated by Sampson S. Lloyd, 1885.

Question 2 of 3

The nation that List accuses of throwing away "the ladders of her greatness" is most likely

Question 3 of 3

List's argument was most directly used to support which policy in the German states?

0 of 3 answered