Skip to main content

Unit 5 · Topic 5.9

5.9 Pre-Equilibrium Approximation

When a fast, reversible step comes before the slow step, the slow step's rate law usually includes an intermediate. You assume the fast step stays at equilibrium, with its forward and reverse rates equal, and use that to rewrite the intermediate's concentration in terms of reactants.

Key terms

  • pre-equilibrium approximation
  • fast equilibrium
  • intermediate
  • rate-determining step

The problem with a slow second step

Suppose the slow step is step 2, and it uses an intermediate made in step 1. Writing the rate law from step 2 would put the intermediate's concentration in it. But an intermediate exists only briefly and its concentration isn't something you control or measure easily, so an experimental rate law is always written in terms of reactants (and sometimes catalysts or products), never intermediates. You need a way to replace it.

The pre-equilibrium approximation

If step 1 is fast and reversible (shown with ⇌), it goes back and forth many times while the slow step is barely getting started. So step 1 is approximately at equilibrium the whole time: its forward rate equals its reverse rate.

That gives you an equation to solve for the intermediate.

  • Write the rate law for the slow step. It contains the intermediate.
  • For the fast equilibrium step, set forward rate = reverse rate, using k₁ for the forward rate constant and k₋₁ for the reverse.
  • Solve that equation for the intermediate's concentration.
  • Substitute it into the slow step's rate law.
  • Combine all the constants into one observed rate constant, k.

A general pattern

For A + B ⇌ I (fast), then I + C → products (slow): the slow step gives rate = k₂[I][C]. The fast equilibrium gives k₁[A][B] = k₋₁[I], so [I] = (k₁/k₋₁)[A][B]. Substituting: rate = (k₂k₁/k₋₁)[A][B][C] = k[A][B][C].

Notice the result. Here the rate law contains every reactant that enters at or before the slow step, each raised to the number of times it enters. That's a handy check on your algebra, but it only works when the fast step makes nothing except the intermediate. If the fast step also makes a product, that product ends up on the bottom of the rate law. For O₃ ⇌ O₂ + O (fast), then O + O₃ → 2O₂ (slow), [O] = (k₁/k₋₁)[O₃]/[O₂], so rate = k[O₃]²/[O₂].

This is how a third-order rate law can come from a mechanism with only bimolecular steps, avoiding an unlikely three-particle collision.

When to use it

Use this approach only when the first step isn't rate limiting: a fast, reversible first step followed by a slow step. When the first step is slow, its rate law is the answer (topic 5.8), and no approximation is needed.

Why the approximation is reasonable

The first step is fast in both directions, while the second step is slow. So most of the intermediate that forms simply falls back apart into reactants long before it has a chance to go on through the slow step. Only a tiny share is drawn off by step 2, so the forward and reverse rates of step 1 stay nearly equal.

The ratio k₁/k₋₁ is the equilibrium constant for step 1. That's why the observed rate constant, k = k₂(k₁/k₋₁), combines a rate constant with an equilibrium constant, a link you'll see again in Unit 7.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Deriving a third-order rate law

    For 2NO(g) + O₂(g) → 2NO₂(g), a proposed mechanism is Step 1 (fast, reversible): NO + NO ⇌ N₂O₂; Step 2 (slow): N₂O₂ + O₂ → 2NO₂. Derive the rate law.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Slow step rate law: rate = k₂[N₂O₂][O₂]. N₂O₂ is an intermediate, so it has to be replaced.
    2. Step 2: Fast equilibrium: forward rate = reverse rate, so k₁[NO]² = k₋₁[N₂O₂].
    3. Step 3: Solve: [N₂O₂] = (k₁/k₋₁)[NO]².
    4. Step 4: Substitute: rate = k₂(k₁/k₋₁)[NO]²[O₂].
    5. Step 5: Combine constants: rate = k[NO]²[O₂], where k = k₁k₂/k₋₁. This matches the experimentally observed third-order rate law.

    Answer: rate = k[NO]²[O₂]

  2. Example 2

    Leaving the intermediate in (classic trap)

    For 2NO + Br₂ → 2NOBr, the mechanism is Step 1 (fast, reversible): NO + Br₂ ⇌ NOBr₂; Step 2 (slow): NOBr₂ + NO → 2NOBr. A student writes rate = k[NOBr₂][NO]. Correct the rate law.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: The student's expression is the slow step's rate law, but NOBr₂ is an intermediate, so it can't appear in the final answer.
    2. Step 2: Fast equilibrium: k₁[NO][Br₂] = k₋₁[NOBr₂], so [NOBr₂] = (k₁/k₋₁)[NO][Br₂].
    3. Step 3: Substitute: rate = k₂(k₁/k₋₁)[NO][Br₂][NO] = k[NO]²[Br₂].
    4. Step 4: Check: NO enters once in step 1 and once in step 2, giving [NO]²; Br₂ enters once, giving [Br₂].

    Answer: rate = k[NO]²[Br₂]

Common mistakes

  • Leaving an intermediate's concentration in the final rate law.
  • Using the pre-equilibrium approach when the first step is the slow step.
  • Setting up the equilibrium backward. Forward rate (k₁ × reactants of step 1) equals reverse rate (k₋₁ × products of step 1).
  • Including species from steps after the slow step in the rate law.

On the exam

  • Expect a mechanism with a fast equilibrium followed by a slow step, and a request to show it's consistent with a given rate law. Show the substitution step clearly; the reasoning earns the points.
  • Remember the shortcut as a check, not as your justification: the final rate law includes the species that enter up through the slow step, unless the fast step also makes a product, which then appears in the denominator.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The pre-equilibrium approximation | Kinetics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Unit 5.9 - Pre-Equilibrium Approximation

    Abigail GiordanoWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Reaction Mechanisms and Rate Laws - AP Chemistry Unit 5, Topics 7-10

    Jeremy Krug (krugslist)Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What is a "Pre-Equilibrium Approximation?" AP Chem 5.9

    CrowdedbeakerWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 5.9 Pre-Equilibrium Approximation. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

A proposed mechanism for the reaction 2NO(g) + Br₂(g) → 2NOBr(g) is shown below.

Step 1 (fast, reversible): NO(g) + Br₂(g) ⇌ NOBr₂(g)

Step 2 (slow): NOBr₂(g) + NO(g) → 2NOBr(g)

Proposed reaction mechanism

Question 1 of 4

Which rate law is consistent with this mechanism?

Question 2 of 4

Which of the following assumptions allows the concentration of NOBr₂ to be written in terms of [NO] and [Br₂]?

A proposed mechanism for the reaction H₂(g) + I₂(g) → 2HI(g) is shown below.

Step 1 (fast, reversible): I₂(g) ⇌ 2I(g)

Step 2 (slow): H₂(g) + 2I(g) → 2HI(g)

Proposed reaction mechanism

Question 3 of 4

Which rate law is consistent with this mechanism?

Question 4 of 4

A single bimolecular step, H₂(g) + I₂(g) → 2HI(g), would have the same rate law as this two-step mechanism. If experiments give that rate law, which of the following is the best conclusion?

0 of 4 answered