Skip to main content

Unit 5 · Topic 5.3

5.3 Mendelian Genetics

Mendel's laws say that the two alleles of a gene separate into different gametes (segregation) and that genes on different chromosomes are inherited independently (independent assortment). With Punnett squares, two probability rules, pedigrees and the chi-square test, you can predict the offspring of a cross and check whether real data fit the prediction.

Key terms

  • allele
  • genotype
  • phenotype
  • law of segregation
  • law of independent assortment
  • chi-square test

The vocabulary

A gene is a stretch of DNA that codes for a product, usually a protein, that affects a trait, and an allele is one version of that gene. A diploid organism has two alleles of each gene, one on each homolog. Your genotype is the set of alleles you have (for example Pp). Your phenotype is the trait you can observe (purple flowers). If both alleles are the same (PP or pp), you're homozygous; if they're different (Pp), you're heterozygous.

A dominant allele shows its phenotype in a heterozygote and is written with a capital letter (P). A recessive allele shows only when there's no dominant allele present, so the genotype must be pp. Dominant doesn't mean more common or better; it only describes what the heterozygote looks like.

Mendel's two laws

The law of segregation says the two alleles of a gene separate when gametes form, so each gamete carries just one allele. This happens because homologs separate in anaphase I. A Pp plant makes half P gametes and half p gametes.

The law of independent assortment says alleles of different genes are sorted into gametes independently of each other, as long as the genes are on different chromosomes. It comes from the random orientation of homologous pairs in metaphase I. A plant that is AaBb makes AB, Ab, aB and ab gametes in equal amounts. Genes close together on the same chromosome break this rule (see linkage in 5.4).

Crosses and the ratios to know

Fertilization joins two haploid gametes and restores the diploid number, creating new allele combinations in the zygote. A Punnett square lists one parent's gametes across the top and the other's down the side, and each box is a possible offspring.

CrossGenotype ratioPhenotype ratio (complete dominance)
Pp × Pp (monohybrid)1 PP : 2 Pp : 1 pp3 dominant : 1 recessive
Pp × pp (test cross of a heterozygote)1 Pp : 1 pp1 dominant : 1 recessive
PP × ppall Ppall dominant
AaBb × AaBb (dihybrid, unlinked)9 genotypes9 : 3 : 3 : 1
AaBb × aabb (dihybrid test cross, unlinked)1 : 1 : 1 : 11 : 1 : 1 : 1

Probability rules

Two rules (both on the AP formula sheet) let you skip big Punnett squares. Multiplication rule: if two events are independent, P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B). Addition rule: if two outcomes are mutually exclusive (they can't both happen), P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B).

Because unlinked genes assort independently, you can treat each gene as its own monohybrid cross and multiply. For AaBb × AaBb, the chance of an aabb offspring is ¼ × ¼ = 1/16. The chance a Pp × Pp offspring is heterozygous is P(P from mom and p from dad) + P(p from mom and P from dad) = ¼ + ¼ = ½.

Test crosses and pedigrees

A test cross tells you whether an organism showing the dominant phenotype is homozygous or heterozygous: cross it with a homozygous recessive. If any offspring show the recessive phenotype, the parent must be heterozygous. If many offspring are all dominant, the parent is very likely homozygous dominant.

A pedigree is a family tree for a trait: squares are males, circles are females, filled shapes are affected, and a horizontal line between a male and a female is a mating. Useful clues: if two unaffected parents have an affected child, the trait is recessive. If an affected child always has at least one affected parent and the trait appears in every generation, it's likely dominant. Two affected parents with an unaffected child means the trait must be dominant. Sex-linked patterns are covered in 5.4.

Chi-square: do the data fit?

Real crosses never hit ratios exactly, so you use a chi-square (χ²) test to decide whether the difference is just chance. The null hypothesis says there's no real difference between observed and expected results (the data fit the predicted ratio). Compute χ² = Σ (o − e)² / e, using counts, not percentages. Degrees of freedom = number of categories − 1. Compare χ² with the critical value at p = 0.05 from the formula sheet (3.84 for 1 df, 5.99 for 2, 7.81 for 3). If χ² is larger than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis; if it's smaller, fail to reject it.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Multiplication rule with three genes

    Two pea plants with genotype AaBbCc are crossed. All three genes are on different chromosomes, and capital letters are dominant. What fraction of offspring will show all three dominant traits except the C trait, meaning A_B_cc?

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Split the cross into three monohybrid crosses: Aa × Aa, Bb × Bb, Cc × Cc.
    2. Step 2: From Aa × Aa, P(dominant phenotype A_) = ¾. From Bb × Bb, P(B_) = ¾. From Cc × Cc, P(cc) = ¼.
    3. Step 3: The genes assort independently, so multiply: ¾ × ¾ × ¼ = 9/64.

    Answer: 9/64 of the offspring (about 14%).

  2. Example 2Calculator allowed

    Chi-square on a dihybrid cross

    A student crosses two plants heterozygous for seed color (Y, yellow, dominant) and seed shape (R, round, dominant) and counts 160 offspring: 92 yellow round, 36 yellow wrinkled, 24 green round and 8 green wrinkled. Do the data support a 9:3:3:1 ratio at p = 0.05?

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Null hypothesis: the genes assort independently, and the offspring fit a 9:3:3:1 ratio; any difference is due to chance.
    2. Step 2: Expected counts: 160 × 9/16 = 90; 160 × 3/16 = 30; 160 × 3/16 = 30; 160 × 1/16 = 10.
    3. Step 3: Compute each (o − e)²/e: (92 − 90)²/90 = 0.044; (36 − 30)²/30 = 1.20; (24 − 30)²/30 = 1.20; (8 − 10)²/10 = 0.40.
    4. Step 4: Add them: χ² = 0.044 + 1.20 + 1.20 + 0.40 ≈ 2.84.
    5. Step 5: Degrees of freedom = 4 categories − 1 = 3. The critical value at p = 0.05 is 7.81.
    6. Step 6: Since 2.84 < 7.81, the difference is small enough to be chance.

    Answer: χ² ≈ 2.84 with 3 degrees of freedom, less than 7.81, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis. The data are consistent with independent assortment and a 9:3:3:1 ratio.

  3. Example 3

    The 2/3 trap in a pedigree

    Two unaffected parents have a child with a recessive disorder. Their other child, Jordan, is unaffected. What is the probability that Jordan is a carrier?

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Unaffected parents with an affected child must both be heterozygous (Aa), so the cross is Aa × Aa.
    2. Step 2: Offspring possibilities: ¼ AA, ½ Aa, ¼ aa.
    3. Step 3: Jordan is unaffected, so Jordan can't be aa. That removes ¼ of the possibilities, leaving AA (¼) and Aa (½).
    4. Step 4: Among unaffected children, the chance of being Aa is (½) ÷ (¼ + ½) = (½) ÷ (¾) = 2/3.
    5. Step 5: The trap is answering ½, which is the carrier chance for any child before you know the child is unaffected.

    Answer: 2/3

Common mistakes

  • Running chi-square on percentages or ratios instead of actual counts. Convert expected ratios into expected numbers of individuals first.
  • Saying you 'accept' or 'prove' the null hypothesis. If χ² is below the critical value, you fail to reject it; if it's above, you reject it.
  • Using the wrong degrees of freedom. It's the number of phenotype categories minus 1, not the number of individuals minus 1.
  • Adding probabilities that should be multiplied. Use multiplication for 'and' with independent events (this gene and that gene), and addition for 'or' with outcomes that can't happen together.

On the exam

  • Chi-square questions are common in free response: state the null hypothesis, show the χ² calculation, give the degrees of freedom and critical value, and say whether you reject or fail to reject, then explain what that means biologically.
  • For pedigree questions, justify your claim with a specific family in the pedigree, for example two unaffected parents with an affected child showing the trait is recessive.

Connected topics

Videos

  • 5.3 Mendelian Genetics - AP Biology (Updated 2025-2026)

    Gabe Poser - PoseKnows BiologyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Mendelian Genetics: From Punnett Squares to Chi-Square Testing | AP Biology 5.3

    Biology DictionaryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Pedigrees

    Amoeba SistersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Mendelian Genetics

    Bozeman ScienceWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Mendelian Genetics: Basic Concepts Explained for AP Bio Students

    sciencemusicvideosWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • How Mendel's pea plants helped us understand genetics - Hortensia Jiménez Díaz

    TED-EdWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 5.3 Mendelian Genetics. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4Calculator allowed

In pea plants, purple flowers (P) are dominant to white flowers (p). Two heterozygous purple-flowered plants are crossed. What fraction of the offspring are expected to have purple flowers?

Question 2 of 4Calculator allowed

For three genes that assort independently, a cross is made between AaBbCc and aaBbCC. What is the probability that an offspring will have the genotype Aa bb Cc?

Question 3 of 4

A black guinea pig (black is dominant to white) of unknown genotype is crossed with a white guinea pig. Of their 10 offspring, 5 are black and 5 are white. Which of the following correctly identifies the black parent's genotype and gives the best reasoning?

Question 4 of 4

In a pedigree, two parents who do not have a certain trait have a daughter who does have the trait. Which mode of inheritance is most consistent with this pattern?

0 of 4 answered