SCOTUS comparison
Employment Division v. Smith and Wisconsin v. Yoder
- Units 2 and 3
- 4 points
- About 20 minutes
You compare a Supreme Court case you haven't studied with one of the required cases, explaining how the required case helps you understand the new one. On the exam: Question 3 of 4 in the free-response section (1 hour 40 minutes for all four, 50% of your score).
The question and its sources
This question asks you to compare a required Supreme Court case with a case you probably haven't studied. Everything you need to know about the second case is in the summary below. Read it and answer parts A, B, and C.
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith (1990)
Alfred Smith and Galen Black worked as counselors at a private drug rehabilitation organization in Oregon. Both were members of the Native American Church and took part in a religious ceremony in which they ingested peyote, a plant that contains a hallucinogenic drug. Oregon law made possession of peyote a crime and did not include an exception for religious use.
Their employer fired them for using the drug. When they applied for unemployment benefits, Oregon denied the benefits because they had been fired for work-related misconduct. Smith and Black argued that the denial punished them for practicing their religion.
The Supreme Court ruled against Smith and Black, 6–3. The majority held that the Constitution does not require states to grant religious exemptions from a neutral, generally applicable criminal law, meaning a law that applies to everyone and does not target religion. Allowing each person to ignore such laws on religious grounds, the Court said, would make every citizen “a law unto himself.”
Source: Case summary written for this question, based on Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)
Suggested time: 20 minutes
Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.
Part (a)
1 pointIdentify the constitutional clause that is common to both Employment Division v. Smith (1990) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972).
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (b)
2 pointsBased on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain how the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder and Employment Division v. Smith led to different holdings.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (c)
1 pointExplain how Congress could respond to the holding in Employment Division v. Smith if a majority of its members wanted to give more protection to religious practices like the one in the case.
0 / 2,500 characters
Checking scoring…
Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.